
[1]. Roger E. Bilstein, Orders of Magnitude: A History of the NACA and NASA, 1915–1990, NASA SP-4406 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1989), ch. 3.
[2]. James Schulz, Winds of Change (Washington, DC: NASA, 1992), pp. 56–57.
[3]. Richard P. Hallion, On the Frontier: Flight Research at Dryden, 1946–1981 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1984), pp. 47–85.
[4]. Donald Baals and William Corliss, Wind Tunnels of NASA, NASA SP-440 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1981), ch. 5-10: “Area Rule and the F-102.”
[5]. Richard T. Whitcomb, “A Study of the Zero-Lift Drag Rise Characteristics of Wing-Body Combinations Near the Speed of Sound,” NACA RM-L52H08 (1952).
[6]. The first was lost earlier in an explosion during a captive carry flight, resulting in the deaths of two crewmen. However, the EB-50 launch aircraft returned safely to base, thanks to the remarkable airmanship of its two pilots.
[7]. Interview with Lockheed test pilot Bob Gilliland by author, Western Museum of Flight, May 16, 2009.
[8]. James R. Hansen, Engineer in Charge, NASA SP-4305 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1987), pp. 276–280; for further discussion on swept wing evolution, see the companion case study by Richard P. Hallion in this volume.
[9]. Interviews with B-58 record flight crewmember Capt. Robert Walton on “Operation Heat Rise” by USAF Museum, location and date unknown, http://www.wvi.com/~sr71webmaster/b58.htm, accessed June 30, 2009.
[10]. Robert H. Cook, “Pyle Says Jet Noise Still Major Problem” Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 69, no. 4 (July 28, 1958), p. 30; “Comet Takes Idlewild Noise Test as Step to Transatlantic Service,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 69, no. 7 (Aug. 18, 1958), pp. 41–42; Glenn Garrison, “Modified 707 Starts Pan Am Cargo Runs,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 69, no. 9 (Sept. 1, 1958), pp. 28–31.
[11]. Cook, “CAA Studies Terminal Air Control Plan,” Aviation Week and Space Technology,vol. 69, no. 12 (Sept. 22, 1958), pp. 40–43; Phillip J. Klass, “Anti-Collision Device Tests Promising,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 69, no. 9 (Sept. 1, 1958), pp 32–33; Klass, “Collision Avoidance Progress,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 73, no. 26 (Dec. 26, 1960), pp. 26–27; Klass, “New Techniques Aimed at Jet Control,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 68, no. 9 (Mar. 3, 1958), pp. 219–223.
[12]. J.S. Butz, Jr., “Industry Studies Transport Area Rule,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 69, no. 2 (July 14, 1958), pp. 48–52; Richard Sweeney, “Area Rule Fits Convair 600 to Meet Jet Age Problems,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 69, no. 10 (Sept. 8, 1958), pp. 50–57.
[13]. Edwin P. Hartman, Adventures in Research: A History of Ames Research Center 1940–1965, NASA SP-4302 (Washington, DC: NASA, 1970), pp. 249–250.
[14]. J.W. Ross and D.B. Rogerson, “Technological Advancements of XB-70,” AIAA Paper 83-1048 (1983), p. 21.
[15]. Peter W. Merlin, Mach 3+ NASA/USAF YF-12 Flight Research 1969–1979 (Washington, DC: NASA, 2002), pp. 1–6.
[16]. John Tunstall, “British Weigh Entering Supersonic Race,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 70, no. 18 (May 4, 1959), pp. 55–56. For the Anglo-French program, see Kenneth Owen, Concorde: Story of a Supersonic Pioneer (London: Science Museum, 2001). The American program is treated in Mel Horwitch, Clipped Wings: The American SST Conflict (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1982), and Erik M. Conway, High-Speed Dreams: NASA and the Technopolitics of Supersonic Transportation, 1945–1999 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005).
[17]. “B-58A Proposed for Transport Research,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 73, no. 20 (Nov. 14, 1960), pp. 54–61.
[18]. Robert Hotz, “Supersonic Transport Race,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 73, no. 20 (Nov. 14, 1960), p. 21.
[19]. “WADD Conference on Supersonic Transport,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 73, no. 11 (Sept. 12, 1960), p. 53.
[20]. As detailed in Owen, Concorde.
[21]. For example, D.D. Baals, O.G. Morris, and T.A. Toll, “Airplane Configurations for Cruise at a Mach Number of 3,” NASA LRC, Conference on High Speed Aerodynamics, NTIS 71N5324 (1958); and M.M. Carmel, A.B. Carraway, and D.T. Gregory, “An Exploratory Investigation of a Transport Configuration Designed for Supersonic Cruise Flight Near a Mach Number of 3,” NASA TM-X-216 (1960).
[22]. D.D. Baals, “Summary of Initial NASA SCAT Airframe and Propulsion Concepts,” in NASA LRC, Proceedings of NASA Conference on Supersonic-Transport Feasibility Studies and Supporting Research, NTIS N67-31606 (1963), pp. 2–21.
[23]. John G. Lowry, “Summary and Assessment of Feasibility Studies,” in NASA, Proceedings of NASA Conference on Supersonic-Transport Feasibility Studies and Supporting Research (1963), p. 52.
[24]. North American Rockwell, Space Division, “B-70 Aircraft Study Final Report,” SD 72-SH-0003, vol. 2 (1972), pp. II-237–238.
[25]. Ibid., vol. 2, pp. II-278–284.
[26]. Ibid., vol. 4, pp. IV-16–64.
[27]. Ibid., vol. 2, p. II-280.
[28]. Chester H. Wolowicz, “Analysis of an Emergency Deceleration and Descent of the XB-70-1 Airplane Due to Engine Damage Resulting from Structural Failure,” NASA TM-X-1195 (1966).
[29]. Author’s recollection.
[30]. Dennis R. Jenkins and Tony R. Landis, Valkyrie: North American’s Mach 3 Superbomber (North Branch, MN: Specialty Press, 2004), pp. 153–164.
[31]. Donald S. Findley, Vera Huckel, and Herbert R. Henderson, “Vibration Responses of Test Structure No. 1 During the Edwards AFB Phase of the National Sonic Boom Program,” NASA TM-72706 (1975); Domenic J. Maglieri, David A. Hilton, and Norman J. McLeod, “Summary of Variations of Sonic Boom Signatures Resulting from Atmospheric Effects,” NASA TM-X-59633 (1967).
[32]. “B-70 Aircraft Study Final Report,” vol. 2, p. II-292.
[33]. Ibid., vol. 2, p. II-25.
[34]. John H. Wykes, et al., “XB-70 Structural Mode Control System Design and Performance Analyses,” NASA CR-1557 (1970).
[35]. Fitzhugh L. Fulton, Jr., “Lessons from the XB-70 as Applied to the Supersonic Transport,” NASA TM-X-56014 (1968).
[36]. Donald L. Hughes, Bruce G. Powers, and William H. Dana, “Flight Evaluation of Some Effects of the Present Air Traffic Control System on Operation of a Simulated Supersonic Transport,” NASA TN-D-2219 (1964).
[37]. H.H. Arnaiz, J.B. Peterson, Jr., and J.C. Daugherty, “Wind-tunnel/flight correlation study of aerodynamic characteristics of a large flexible supersonic cruise airplane (XB-70-1),” pt. 3: “A comparison between characteristics predicted from wind-tunnel measurements and those measured in flight,” NASA TP-1516 (1980).
[38]. Maglieri, et al., “A Summary of XB-70 Sonic Boom Signature Data,” NASA CR-189630 (1992).
[39]. Glenn Garrison, “Supersonic Transport May Aim at Mach 3,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 70, no. 5 (Feb. 2, 1959), pp. 38–40; J.S. Butz, Jr., “FAA, NASA Study Supersonic Transport,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, vol. 72, no. 18 (May 2, 1960).
[40]. Bill Yenne, “America’s Supersonic Transports,” Flightpath, vol. 3 (2004), pp 146–157.
[41]. William A. Shurcliff, SST and Sonic Boom Handbook (New York: Ballantine Books, 1970).
[42]. Yenne, “America’s SST,” p. 155.
[43]. Joe Sutter, with Jay Spenser, 747: Creating the World’s First Jumbo Jet and Other Adventures from a Life in Aviation (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books, 2006), pp. 202–224.
[44]. Joseph R. Chambers, Innovations in Flight: Research of the NASA Langley Flight Research Center on Revolutionary Concepts for Advanced Aeronautics (Washington DC: NASA, 2005), pp 39–48.
[45]. Sherwood Hoffman, “Bibliography of Supersonic Cruise Aircraft Research (SCAR) Program, 1972-mid 1977,” NASA RP-1003 (1977); Hoffman, “Supersonic Cruise Research (SCR) Program Publications FY 1977–1979: Preliminary Bibliography,” NASA TM-80184 (1979).
[46]. Barrett L. Schout, et al., “Review of NASA Supercruise Configuration Studies,” presented at Supercruise Military Aircraft Design Conference, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, CO, Feb. 17–20, 1976; B.R. Wright, F. Bruckman, et al., “Arrow Wings for Supersonic Cruise Aircraft,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 15, no. 12 (Dec. 1978), pp. 829–836.
[47]. Chambers, Partners in Freedom: Contributions of the Langley Research Center to U.S. Military Aircraft of the 1990s, No. 19 in the Monographs in Aerospace History series (Washington, DC: NASA, 2000), pp. 156–158.
[48]. Merlin, Mach 3+, pp. 7–11.
[49]. Jerald M. Jenkins and Robert D. Quinn, “A Historical Perspective of the YF-12A Thermal Loads and Structures Program,” NASA TM-104317 (1996).
[50]. Donald T. Berry and Glenn B. Gilyard, “A Review of Supersonic Cruise Flight Path Control,” in Proceedings of NASA Aircraft Safety and Operating Problems, Oct. 18–20, 1976, NASA SP-416 (1977), pp. 147–164.
[51]. James A. Albers, “Status of YF-12 Propulsion Research,” NASA TM-X-56039 (1976).
[52]. Donald T. Berry and William G. Schweikhard, “Potential Benefits of Propulsion and Flight Control Integration for Supersonic Cruise Vehicles,” in NASA TM-X-3409 (1974), pp. 433–452.
[53]. D.L. Anderson, G.F. Connolly, F.M. Mauro, and P.J. Reukauf, “YF-12 Cooperative Airframe/Propulsion Control System Program,” vol. 1, NASA CR-163099 (1980), pp. 4-39–4-49.
[54]. Merlin, Mach 3+, pp. 34–36.
[55]. Chambers, Innovation in Flight, pp. 40–61.
[56]. T. Edwards, et al., “Sonic Boom Prediction and Minimization Using Computational Fluid Dynamics,” in NASA, First Annual High Speed Research Workshop, May 14–16, 1991, Williamsburg, VA (1991).
[57]. Tu-144LL testing is the subject of a subsequent case study in this volume.
[58]. Timothy H. Cox and Alisa Marshall, “Longitudinal Handling Qualities of the Tu-144LL Airplane and Comparisons With Other Large, Supersonic Aircraft,” NASA TM-2000-209020 (2000).
[59]. Bianca T. Anderson and Marta Bohn-Meyer, “Overview of Supersonic Laminar Flow Control Research on F-16XL Ships 1 and 2,” NASA TM-104257 (1992).
[60]. A.G. Powell “Supersonic LFC: Challenges and Opportunities,” in NASA, First Annual High Speed Research Workshop, May 14–16, 1991, Williamsburg, VA (1991), p. 1824.
[61]. Timothy H. Cox, and Dante Jackson, “Supersonic Flying Qualities Experience Using the SR-71,” NASA TM-4800 (1997), pp. 4–5.
[62]. Stephen Corda, Bradford A. Neal, Timothy R. Moes, Timothy H. Cox, Richard C. Monaghan, Leonard S. Voelker, Griffin P. Corpening, and Richard R. Larson “Flight Testing the Linear Aerospike SR-71 Experiment (LASRE),” NASA TM-1998-206567 (1998).
[63]. M. Leroy Spearman, “The Evolution of the High-Speed Civil Transport,” NASA TM-109089 (1994) is an excellent configuration survey. See also A. Warner Robins, et al., “Concept Development of a Mach 3.0 High-Speed Civil Transport,” NASA TM-4058 (1988); P.G. Parikh and A.L. Nagel, “Application of Laminar Flow Control to Supersonic Transport Configurations,” NASA CR-181917 (1990); Christopher D. Domack, et al., “Concept Development of a Mach 4 High-Speed Civil Transport,” NASA TM-4223 (1990); T. Edwards, et al., “Sonic Boom Prediction and Minimization Using Computational Fluid Dynamics,” in NASA, First Annual High Speed Research Workshop, May 14–16, 1991, Williamsburg, VA (1991); A.G. Powell, “Supersonic LFC: Challenges and Opportunities,” in NASA, First Annual High Speed Research Workshop, May 14–16, 1991, Williamsburg, VA (1991); Bianca T. Anderson and Marta Bohn-Meyer, “Overview of Supersonic Laminar Flow Control Research on F-16XL Ships 1 and 2,” NASA TM-104257 (1992).
[64]. National Science and Technology Council, Executive Office of the President, “Report to the Congress: Impact of the Termination of NASA’s High Speed Research Program and The Redirection of NASA’s Advanced Subsonic Technology Program,” p. 6.
[65]. Chambers, Innovation in Flight, pp. 62–68.
[66]. The experiment is detailed in another case study within this volume.
[67]. Dan Banks, “Overview of Experimental Capabilities,” in NASA Fundamental Aeronautics 2007 Annual Meeting, Oct. 30–Nov. 1, 2007, New Orleans, LA.
Describe what you're looking for in as much detail as you'd like.
Our AI reads your request and finds the best matching books for you.
Popular searches:
Join 2 million readers and get unlimited free ebooks